NovaMDR leverages leading-edge security technology and world-class security experts
We are committed to supporting our customers in their journey towards regulatory compliance.
ForeNova represents a new way for companies to put an end to relentless, and often undetected, cyber threats coming from every direction. With ForeNova’s unified command center, businesses can detect threats that are already inside their network, and previously unknown.
11 Nov, 2024
5 Nov, 2024
1 Nov, 2024
Table of content
An Access Control List (ACL) is a security mechanism which is designed to determine which user or which system has the right to access a specific object or system resource, such as files, directories, network services and so on. As well as operations are allowed on given objects, including read, edit or execute. Thus, ACLs can be seen as a fundamental component of a robust security strategy.
Firewalls and ACLs are crucial components of a comprehensive network security strategy, with each playing an important role in securing the organization's sensitive resources. The following are the main distinctions between firewalls and ACLs:
Scope: Firewalls govern traffic flow at the network perimeter, whereas ACLs control access permissions within the network.
Detail Functions: ACLs primarily provide specific users with granular access control based on task level or job title with the creator's settings to protect resources, whereas firewalls attempt to monitor and control incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predetermined security rules to ensure system security.
Implementation: Firewalls are independent hardware or software programs that must be placed on the network. ACLs, on the other hand, are built into network interfaces and operating systems as well as configurable on some routers and switches.
ACLs are specified sets of rules that are vital for sustaining the security and integrity of both network resources and local systems:
Many industries, such as healthcare, finance, retail, telecommunications, automotive industry, etc., have regulatory requirements for controlling access and protecting customer data. With the implementation of ACLs, organizations can comply with these regulations by ensuring only specific users are granted access to or modify sensitive information.
An ACL consists of the following several components central to its function:
Sequence number: The sequence number identifies the ACL entry with a specific number.
ACL name: The ACL name defines the ACL entry by using a specific name assigned to it instead of numbers. But in some cases, the router will allow use of both numbers and characters.
Remark: On some routers, you can insert some comments to show more detailed descriptions.
Statement: With a statement, you can permit or deny a source using a wildcard mask or address, which can dictate the system to examine a specific element of an IP address.
Network protocol: The network protocol can be used to permit or deny certain networking protocols, such as IP, Internetwork Packet Exchange (IPX), Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP), User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and so on.
Source or destination: The source or destination component defines the destination or source IP address as an address range or a single IP or allows all addresses.
Log: There are devices that can maintain a log when they find ACL matches.
Other criteria of advanced ACLs: Some more advanced ACLs give you the option to control traffic according to IP precedence, the type of service (ToS), or its priority as derived from its Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP), which is a networking architecture that allows for the classification and management of traffic on a network.
To ensure that users and systems are following the prescribed rules, an ACL might be installed on some routers or switches for monitoring incoming and outgoing network traffic. Besides, it can also be built into any various network interfaces and operating systems to manage and enforce security policies. Whether which methods, ACLs are a fundamental tool for preserving organizations’ security and integrity across both networked and local environments.
If you’re looking to implement an ACL, ForeNova is on call to help you every step of the way. However, to correctly deploy ACL on your router, you must understand how traffic flows in and out. You define the rules from the perspective of the router's interface. This differs from that of the networks. For example, if traffic enters a router, it exits a network; hence, the perspective has a significant impact on how the traffic's path is depicted.
To work properly, an ACL must be added to the router's interface. The router's hardware executes the forwarding and routing decisions, making the process quicker.
While adding an ACL entry, enter the source address first and then the destination address. When supplied in this style, the router recognizes the entry and reads it. The source is where the traffic originates, which is located "outside" of the router. The destination is the location beyond the router where the data packets will finish up.
|
Linux ACL |
Windows ACL |
Type |
POSIX ACLs |
NTFS ACLs |
Permissions |
Read, Write, Execute |
Full Control, Modify, Read, Execute, List Folder Contents, Write |
Management |
Command Line |
GUI or Command Line |
Inheritance |
Limited support |
Strong support |
Integration |
Linux file system |
Windows operating system and Active Directory |
Linux ACL provides more flexible permission mechanisms for resources in the Linux file system compared to the traditional Unix file permission system. While Windows ACL is the security function in the Windows operating system that controls the permissions for access to sensitive files.
Although both aim to enhance the safeguard of the organization system, there are 4 points that are different and need to be pointed out:
Detailed Permissions: Windows ACL provides a wider range of more granular permissions for users with not only Read, Write, and Execute but also Modify and Full Control.
Interface Management: Linux mainly uses Command Line tools, while Windows manages through the Windows Explorer GUI or using command line tools.
Inheritance: Compared to Linux, Windows has more robust inheritance features, which means the permission can be inherited from parent directories.
System Integration: Windows ACLs are tightly integrated with both the Windows operating system and Active Directory (AD), which provides more centralized control in a networked environment compared to the decentralized nature of Linux file systems.